An Almanac Exhibit Volume I, No. 3

Twins,
Apart

Twins. Same returns, same retirement age. One starts at 25 and saves for ten years. The other starts at 35 and saves for thirty. Three times the contributions. Same arithmetic. Different lives.

I.

The Players

B

Benson

— The Early Starter —

At age 25, Benson starts saving $5,000 a year. He does this for ten years — through age 34 — then never adds another dollar. He just lets it ride.

A

Ada

— The Diligent Latecomer —

At age 35, Ada starts saving $5,000 a year. She does this for thirty years — every single year through age 64. She contributes three times as much as Benson.

II.

The Stage

— Before You Watch · Place Your Bet —
Benson puts in $50,000 total. Ada puts in $150,000.
Both retire at 65. Who has more, and by how much?
Same 8% annual return. Same retirement age. Ada contributes three times as much. Place your bet — there's no penalty for being wrong.
Portfolio Value by Age | Age 25 — 65 | 8% assumed annual return
Benson — saves age 25–34, then nothing
Ada — saves age 35–64, every year
As of age
25
YEAR 1 / 40
Investor Contributed Balance Multiple
Benson $0 $0
Ada $0 $0
— The Verdict —
III.

The Reckoning

Age 65 Same returns. Same retirement age. Three times the contributions for the latecomer. Yet the early starter walks away with more.

Investor Strategy Total Contributed Balance at 65 Multiple
Benson Save $5K/yr ages 25–34, then never contribute again
Ada Save $5K/yr ages 35–64, every single year